A short note on turbulence characteristics in wind-turbine wakes

Analytical wake models need formulations to mimic the impact of wind turbines on turbulence level in the wake region. Several correlations can be found in the literature for this purpose, one of which is the formula proposed in A. Crespo, J. Hernandez, Turbulence characteristics in wind-turbine wakes, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 61 (1) (1996) 71 - 85, which relates the added turbulence to the induction factor of the turbine, ambient turbulence intensity, and normalized distance from the rotor through an equation with one coefficient and three exponents for the effective parameters. Misuse of this formula with an incorrect exponent for the ambient turbulence intensity is propagating in the literature. In this note, we implement the original and the incorrect formulation of turbine-induced added turbulence in a Gaussian wake model to quantify its impact by studying the Horns Rev 1 wind farm. The results reveal that the turbulence intensity and the normalized power of the waked turbines predicted by the wake model with the correct and the incorrect implementation of turbine-induced added turbulence correlation have a difference equal to 1.94% and 3.53%, respectively, for an ambient turbulence intensity of 7.7%. For an ambient turbulence intensity of 4%, these discrepancies grow to 2.7% and 4.95%.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figure

Frozen propagation of Reynolds force vector from high-fidelity data into Reynolds-averaged simulations of secondary flows

Successful propagation of information from high-fidelity sources (i.e., direct numerical simulations and large-eddy simulations) into Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations plays an important role in the emerging field of data-driven RANS modeling. Small errors carried in high-fidelity data can propagate amplified errors into the mean flow field, and higher Reynolds numbers worsen the error propagation. In this study, we compare a series of propagation methods for two cases of Prandtl's secondary flows of the second kind: square-duct flow at a low Reynolds number and roughness-induced secondary flow at a very high Reynolds number. We show that frozen treatments result in less error propagation than the implicit treatment of Reynolds stress tensor (RST), and for cases with very high Reynolds numbers, explicit and implicit treatments are not recommended. Inspired by the obtained results, we introduce the frozen treatment to the propagation of Reynolds force vector (RFV), which leads to less error propagation. Specifically, for both cases at low and high Reynolds numbers, propagation of RFV results in one order of magnitude lower error compared to RST propagation. In the frozen treatment method, three different eddy-viscosity models are used to evaluate the effect of turbulent diffusion on error propagation. We show that, regardless of the baseline model, the frozen treatment of RFV results in less error propagation. We combined one extra correction term for turbulent kinetic energy with the frozen treatment of RFV, which makes our propagation technique capable of reproducing both velocity and turbulent kinetic energy fields similar to high-fidelity data

Physics-guided machine learning for wind-farm power prediction: Toward interpretability and generalizability

With the increasing amount of available data from simulations and experiments, research for the development of data-driven models for wind-farm power prediction has increased significantly. While the data-driven models can successfully predict the power of a wind farm with similar characteristics as those in the training ensemble, they generally do not have a high degree of flexibility for extrapolation to unseen cases in contrast to the physics-based models. In this paper, we focus on data-driven models with improved interpretability and generalizability levels that can predict the performance of turbines in wind farms. To prepare the datasets, several cases are defined based on the layouts of operational wind farms, and massive computational fluid dynamics simulations are performed. The extreme gradient boosting algorithm is used afterward to build models, which have turbine-level geometric inputs in combination with the efficiency from physics-based models as the features. After training, to analyze the models' capability in generalization, their predictions for the unseen cases with different operating conditions, inflow turbulence levels, and wind-farm layouts are compared to the Park model and an empirical-analytical Gaussian wake model. Results show that the physics-guided machine-learning models outperform both physics-based models showing a high degree of generalizability, and the machine is not sensitive to the choice of the physics-based guide model

An Analytical Model for the Effect of Vertical Wind Veer on Wind Turbine Wakes

In this study, an analytical wake model for predicting the mean velocity field downstream of a wind turbine under veering incoming wind is systematically derived and validated. The new model, which is an extended version of the one introduced by Bastankhah and Porté-Agel, is based upon the application of mass conservation and momentum theorem and considering a skewed Gaussian distribution for the wake velocity deficit. Particularly, using a skewed (instead of axisymmetric) Gaussian shape allows accounting for the lateral shear in the incoming wind induced by the Coriolis force. This analytical wake model requires only the wake expansion rate as an input parameter to predict the mean wake flow downstream. The performance of the proposed model is assessed using the large-eddy simulation (LES) data of a full-scale wind turbine wake under the stably stratified condition. The results show that the proposed model is capable of predicting the skewed structure of the wake downwind of the turbine, and its prediction for the wake velocity deficit is in good agreement with the high-fidelity simulation data

A survey of machine learning wall models for large eddy simulation

This survey investigates wall modeling in large eddy simulations (LES) using data-driven machine learning (ML) techniques. To this end, we implement three ML wall models in an open-source code and compare their performances with the equilibrium wall model in LES of half-channel flow at eleven friction Reynolds numbers between $180$ and $10^{10}$. The three models have ''seen'' flows at only a few Reynolds numbers. We test if these ML wall models can extrapolate to unseen Reynolds numbers. Among the three models, two are supervised ML models, and one is a reinforcement learning ML model. The two supervised ML models are trained against direct numerical simulation (DNS) data, whereas the reinforcement learning ML model is trained in the context of a wall-modeled LES with no access to high-fidelity data. The two supervised ML models capture the law of the wall at both seen and unseen Reynolds numbers--although one model requires re-training and predicts a smaller von K\'arm\'an constant. The reinforcement learning model captures the law of the wall reasonably well but has errors at both low ($Re_\tau<10^3$) and high Reynolds numbers ($Re_\tau>10^6$). In addition to documenting the results, we try to ''understand'' why the ML models behave the way they behave. Analysis shows that the errors of the supervised ML model is a result of the network design and the errors in the reinforcement learning model arise due to the present choice of the ''states'' and the mismatch between the neutral line and the line separating the action map. In all, we see promises in data-driven machine learning models

Log-law recovery through reinforcement-learning wall model for large-eddy simulation

This paper focuses on the use of reinforcement learning (RL) as a machine-learning (ML) modeling tool for near-wall turbulence. RL has demonstrated its effectiveness in solving high-dimensional problems, especially in domains such as games. Despite its potential, RL is still not widely used for turbulence modeling and is primarily used for flow control and optimization purposes. A new RL wall model (WM) called VYBA23 is developed in this work, which uses agents dispersed in the flow near the wall. The model is trained on a single Reynolds number ($Re_\tau = 10^4$) and does not rely on high-fidelity data, as the back-propagation process is based on a reward rather than output error. The states of the RLWM, which are the representation of the environment by the agents, are normalized to remove dependence on the Reynolds number. The model is tested and compared to another RLWM (BK22) and to an equilibrium wall model, in a half-channel flow at eleven different Reynolds numbers ($Re_\tau \in [180;10^{10}]$). The effects of varying agents' parameters such as actions range, time-step, and spacing are also studied. The results are promising, showing little effect on the average flow field but some effect on wall-shear stress fluctuations and velocity fluctuations. This work offers positive prospects for developing RLWMs that can recover physical laws, and for extending this type of ML models to more complex flows in the future.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2211.0361